James Gunn brings Blue Beetle back for Man of Tomorrow, 3 years after calling him “the first DCU character”
Jaime Reyes returns as canon, but Gunn’s universe play depends on how many details survive the retcon.

Xolo Maridueña is returning as Jaime Reyes (Blue Beetle) in James Gunn’s upcoming DCU movie Man of Tomorrow. The decision matters for executives because it shows Gunn is rebuilding the DC universe with a selective, retcon-friendly canon strategy that affects everything from audience expectations to pipeline planning.
James Gunn is getting his “first DCU character” moment back in motion. Three years after Gunn called Blue Beetle “the first DCU character,” Xolo Maridueña is returning as Jaime Reyes in the upcoming DCU film Man of Tomorrow, reprising his role for the first time since the character’s 2023 solo movie. The immediate question for decision-makers is how Reyes fits into the Superman follow-up, directed by Gunn, especially since the source notes that it has not yet been revealed how his story plugs in.
That said, Gunn has signaled the fit is real, not ornamental. In 2025, Gunn said that only a “couple things” will have to be retconned to bring him in, specifically referencing how that process worked with Peacemaker. It also helps to remember the earlier framing that caused some confusion: in 2023, Gunn appeared on Michael Rosenbaum's podcast and called Blue Beetle “the first DCU character,” but also clarified that “the first full DCU movie is Superman.” Put together, the pattern looks deliberate: the character is canon, but the solo movie may not be treated as the same type of canonical anchor as the broader shared universe reboot.
From a universe-building standpoint, this is the kind of strategy that can either tighten a cinematic brand or quietly fracture it. If you tell audiences a character is “first,” you create an expectation that their canon is stable. If you then imply their solo film requires retcon work, you are effectively telling studios, marketing teams, and downstream partners that continuity will be managed like a living product, not a museum exhibit. Gunn’s mention of Peacemaker as precedent matters here because it suggests the DC Studios co-CEO is comfortable with adjusting details so the “universe logic” remains coherent across projects.
The stakes rise when you look at who Man of Tomorrow is trying to be. The film pairs David Corenswet and Nicholas Hoult as Clark Kent and Lex Luthor, and it centers on a new-villain threat: Brainiac. It also appears to be designed as a team-up vehicle with Isabela Merced's Hawkgirl, Milly Alcock's Supergirl, Aaron Pierre's Green Lantern, and Adria Arjona's unnamed hero in the cast. For executives thinking about pipeline risk, that matters because it implies Man of Tomorrow is not just continuing Superman. It is consolidating multiple DC touchpoints into one “stacked” release, likely aimed at turning individual character threads into a bigger, shared draw.
This is where the broader DC calendar becomes a real constraint. The source flags “following the box office struggles of Supergirl,” the next DCU project is Lanterns, which heads to HBO Max in August. That detail is more than scheduling. It shows the strategy is splitting the business between theatrical and streaming, likely with different risk tolerance and different audience behavior expectations. If Lanterns is the streaming follow-on, then bringing Blue Beetle into Man of Tomorrow becomes a test of whether Gunn can repackage existing character goodwill into a cohesive event movie without overburdening continuity.
Even the title timing signals how aggressive the planning has to be. Man of Tomorrow flies onto screens on July 9, 2027. That is far enough out for development changes, but close enough that marketing strategy cannot wait. If Gunn expects that “a couple things” need retconned, then those changes have to land early enough for creative teams to sync story beats, for marketing teams to avoid messaging that accidentally contradicts retconned canon, and for stakeholders to align expectations with what audiences will accept as “canon.”
For peers running entertainment portfolios, the second-order takeaway is simple: canon management is becoming an operating model, not a footnote. The Gunn approach, as described in the source, suggests a universe where characters can be treated as canonical building blocks, even if the details of how they arrived need light surgery. That can protect the brand when launching new projects, but it also forces leaders to think in terms of continuity risk, not just creative risk. The question is whether “fit in very nicely,” as Gunn said he expects, will translate into a shared universe that audiences feel is consistent enough to invest in, project after project.
This story's Key Insights and Take-aways are locked.
Create a free account to unlock Executive Actions for one credit.
Register to UnlockAlways free for Executives Club members. Join the Club
More in Entertainment

Zelda’s 40th gets real: multiple September 2026 releases start the anniversary sprint
Nintendo’s quiet moment ends. Here’s what kicks off the 40th, when it starts, and why executives should care.

Steve Buscemi joins Far Cry FX cast, and the villain casting pattern is loud
Buscemi’s addition to Noah Hawley’s anthology Far Cry raises expectations, especially alongside Far Cry 6’s Antón Castillo casting.

CapCut, Moonmax and Raindance co-launch “Lost Canon” AI film series built in CapCut Video Studio
Ten filmmakers debut AI-native shorts in London, showing how quickly creative pipelines are moving into AI-native tools.

