Skip to content
The Executives BriefThe Executives BriefBeta

Netflix uses an AI Gene Wilder voice for Willy Wonka reality show

A new teaser confirms September 23 on Netflix, but the voiceover is synthetic, made with ElevenLabs and Wilder family consent.

ByMaha Al-JuhaniEntertainment Correspondent, The Executives Brief
·4 min read
Netflix uses an AI Gene Wilder voice for Willy Wonka reality show
Executive summary

Netflix confirmed that Wonka's The Golden Ticket premieres on September 23, following its Squid Game reality show. The teaser uses an AI-generated Gene Wilder voiceover created with ElevenLabs, with consent from Wilder's family.

Netflix is leaning hard into the weirdest part of AI: not just the visuals, but the voice. A new teaser trailer confirmed that Wonka's The Golden Ticket will premiere on Netflix on September 23, following its Squid Game reality show. The sets shown in the trailer are real, not “Glasgow-style” AI fakes, but the voiceover is AI-generated.

Deadline reports that Netflix worked with AI audio company ElevenLabs to create that AI Gene Wilder voiceover, and that Netflix did so with consent from Wilder's family. The result is a reality competition built around a fictional world, using a synthesized version of a real actor's voice. For executives, that is the part worth focusing on: the show is not just borrowing branding, it is borrowing identity, then translating it into audio that sounds like it came from the original performer.

This lands in a broader Netflix pattern. The teaser is also part of Netflix's 2021 partnership with the Roald Dahl company. That matters because Dahl and associated rights tend to be tightly governed, and because streaming platforms have to balance creative marketing with rights management. Here, Netflix is essentially doing two things at once: building hype for a physical-sounding, real-world competition experience, while also pushing the frontier on how IP is reenacted. The voice is synthetic, but the “stagecraft” is real. That blend is exactly how entertainment companies are trying to get the best of both worlds: spectacle without the time and constraints of traditional production.

Netflix is not doing this in isolation either. The source notes that this is consistent with Netflix's earlier work on productions re-creating the voice of Michael Caine and Stan Lee. That continuity matters for decision-makers because it signals an internal capability stack, not a one-off experiment. Once a company can reliably produce AI voice for recognizable celebrities, it can scale quickly across new titles and promotions. It also changes what audiences expect from trailers. If audiences get used to AI voices showing up in marketing, the bar for “good enough” gets higher, and the cost of authenticity becomes part of the production equation.

There is also a legal and regulatory dimension, even when the public framing stays marketing-first. The source explicitly says Netflix got consent from Wilder's family. In practice, that is the difference between a controlled licensing-like arrangement and a messy rights dispute. Voice is not just performance, it is a type of likeness and identity. Even where laws vary by jurisdiction, rights holders and regulators tend to converge on the principle that people and estates should have a say over commercial use. Consent can reduce legal risk and it also reduces reputational risk, because audiences know when a company is trying to impersonate versus when it is collaborating.

Still, consent does not eliminate every second-order problem. It can set precedents for what is considered acceptable, and it can shift expectations across the industry. If Netflix can generate AI voices with family consent, other studios and platforms may rush to secure similar agreements. That can create pressure on estates and agents to standardize terms faster, and on boards to clarify policies around AI-generated publicity materials. The bigger the platform, the more it becomes the reference point for what “normal” looks like. In other words, this is not only about Gene Wilder. It is about how quickly consent-based AI media becomes the default playbook for large entertainment companies.

There is another strategic nuance: Netflix is not merging this with other competitive Willy Wonka programming. The source is clear that this is separate from “Charlie vs. the Chocolat...” and that the teaser and upcoming show are distinct from that other project. For executives, that separation signals brand hygiene. In a crowded IP universe, confusing product lines can blur rights boundaries and weaken marketing clarity. Netflix appears to be keeping the narrative contained: one property, one format, one launch moment, and a single set of rules about what is in and what is out.

So what is the actual stake for peers? It is the operational and governance question boards cannot ignore: if AI voice is now a mainstream marketing tool for major streamed franchises, how do you control quality, consent, and downstream usage across a growing slate? Netflix is effectively demonstrating that it can get from “fictional world” to “real audio identity” inside a single campaign. The companies that move fastest will likely also be the ones that define the next norm, and then deal with the consequences when that norm gets tested by regulators, rights holders, or public backlash.

In short: Netflix's September 23 premiere of Wonka's The Golden Ticket follows Squid Game's reality playbook, but the teaser adds a new twist. Real sets, real production value, and an AI-generated Gene Wilder voiceover made with ElevenLabs and Wilder's family's consent. That combination is a roadmap for where entertainment is going: closer to reality, closer to recognizable identity, and increasingly dependent on who can secure rights and build trust as fast as they can ship hype.

Executive ActionsLocked

This story's Key Insights and Take-aways are locked.

Create a free account to unlock Executive Actions for one credit.

Register to Unlock

Always free for Executives Club members. Join the Club

More in Entertainment